Descartes Reinvented

In this study, Tom Sorell seeks to rehabilitate views that are often instantly dismissed in analytic philosophy. His book serves as a reinterpretation of Cartesianism and responds directly to the dislike of Descartes in contemporary philosophy. To identify what is defensible in Cartesianism, Sorell starts with a picture of unreconstructed Cartesianism, which is characterized as realistic, antisceptical but respectful of scepticism, rationalist, centered on the first person, dualist, and dubious of the comprehensiveness of natural science and its supposed independence of metaphysics. Bridging the gap between history of philosophy and analytic philosophy, Sorell also shows for the first time how some contemporary analytic philosophy is deeply Cartesian, despite its outward hostility to Cartesianism.

• Shows, for the first time, how deeply Cartesian some contemporary analytic philosophy is • It distinguishes unacceptable from acceptable claims in Cartesianism, while making clear the roots of acceptable or ‘innocent’ Cartesianism • Enables philosophers who use ‘Cartesian’ as a term of abuse and Descartes scholars to communicate on a range of issues

1. Radical doubt and inner space; 2. Knowledge, the self and internalism; 3. The belief in foundations; 4. Conscious experience and the mind; 5. Reason, emotion and action; 6. Anthropology, misogyny, and anthropocentrism; Conclusion.